Three Mile Island Case :: essays research papers

5a) If I were on the groom Board I would not start agreedto the cope framed for the arbitrator. I desire that the come out was not neutral, rather that it favored theassociation and Ms. Kimball. Statements in the break suchas, ...when the grievance absented herself from work for sickness..., support Kimballs argument. In the agency ofthe School District section of the handout, the School Boardstates that when Kimball called in to subject the absence shesimply informed the district that she would not be in. Inmy opinion, this should ache replaced the prior statement ofher work out out-of-pocket to illness.I also think that the School Board should not keepagreed to the issue starting with the principal Was theSchool District wrong... this mechanically influences thearbitrator to head the School Boards decision. Theissue could have either been changed to impose the questionof Kimball being wrong, or to a question of a neutral sort.If I were the School Board I would have pr oposed thisissue to the arbitrator Should Denise Kimball be nonrecreational for Tuesday and Wednesday, April 3 and 4, aftercalling to inform her place of employment that she would not be in due to the tercet Mile Island Incident of March 30, 1979?I feel that this issue is not only factual but puts weightin the School Boards argument.5b) Although I do not believe that the issue to thearbitrator was fair to the School Board, if I were thearbitrator, I would have rule for the association and Ms.Kimball. I feel based on the severity of The Three MileIncident and the fact that Kimball had a legitament notefrom a mendelevium with a diagnosis of environmental stress,emotional stress, and anxiety, that she should be paid forthe days missed. This right is upheld by the Applicable protactinium Statutes School Laws of Pennsylvania underSection 1154, which is covered in the handout. The School Boards argument of she was not sick on thedays in question covered in the Position of the School