Wednesday, March 20, 2019

Robert Siricos Samaritans Dilemma :: essays research papers

In the screen Samaritans Dilemma, Robert Sirico claims that charity is not always upholdful to society. He implies that slightly hatful take advantage of opposites kindness, in this case, soup kitchens.To support his claim, Sirico told a story of when he was training to be a priest. He states that separately Friday he would help set up and serve a supernumerary meal to those in need, usually 200 to 500 tidy sum. One Friday subsequently the meal, he and a friend cleaned up then went to a seafood barroom just down the street. While take ining the two men completed that the soup kitchen they had just finished working at was competition to the seafood pub and other surrounding restaurants. They realized that their charity was do it harder for other entrepreneurs to gravel a living and provide for their families.Sirico basically states that when people are waited on hand and foot they become more dependant on others, therefore, making it even harder for them to get out o f poverty. He also implies that giving handouts to people encourages laziness. He says, When charity creates a disincentive for an able-bodied psyche to work, it leads this person down the wrong path. It encourages indolence. Real work provides the individual with the vehicle for a productive and virtuous life. It gives a person self esteem and a role to play in society.The support he uses does not help his case, though. For example, the comparison Sirico shits of the soup kitchen to a seafood pub is irrelevant. He states, "Just a block away we provide a product and a table service that make this mans effort to provide for his own family more difficult. A soup kitchen and a seafood pub are not comparable. The pub has the intention to make money, whereas a soup kitchen is not interested in money. Soup kitchens are there for the purpose of people who cannot afford to eat at other places. The speaker never states the prices or quality of food at the pub. This instruction would help the reader recognize the similarities and differences between the two. Sirico fails to mention the other restaurants that are also the pub owners competition. Surrounding restaurants may be taking telephone circuit from the pub, not the soup kitchen. In addition, Sirico uses insufficient personal experience to apprize that people are taking advantage of charity. After observing people coming to the soup kitchen, Sirico noticed a couple that "told me they needed to eat quickly because they were planning to go shopping after dinner.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.