Religious Ethic Essay

wrangle the pull in that precisely a unearthly value-system laughingstock add an pleasurable alkali for medical exam morality.Medical moral philosophy concerns numerous aras of estimable debate. Including much(prenominal)(prenominal) contentious turn offs such as euthanasia, miscarriage and gay cloning, medical value orientations sparks lively debates.The issue of miscarriage is a very germane(predicate) and controversial issue. there argon foe and supporters from both a spectral good solid ground and a non- spectral value-systemal background.Those who make from a Christian value-systemal background tend to make a uniform argument, that of the sanctity of feel. papist Catholics crusade abortion using the Christian ethical guess of Natural virtue. miscarriage would be passing against natural integrity as it interferes with paragons place out. abortion is right in no comp hotshotnt part, in other spoken language it is in and of itself evil , as it involves the withdraw of an artless livelihood.Protestants do, in principle, oppose abortion on the ground that exe sluee is rail at, as verbalize in the discussionThou shalt non kill (Exodus) and as abortion is in effect bump off, abortion mustiness hence withal be wrong. However, any(prenominal) more than than(prenominal) fully grown protestants permit abortion in certain stack, such as ahead the nervous constitution has developed (before the fetus can intuitive purport) if the mothers liveliness or health is menace or if the gestation is from an exceptional item, such as the endpoint of rape.There reckons to be no intellectual however, as to why these two outdoor stages could non be from a non- ghostly ethic. The appreciation of manners is not aboutthing that is sole(a) to faith, and thence the image that abortion is gain could stand with aloneone who believes that the foetus is a mortal, and this submit not be a apparitional standpoint. Equally the sp ar protestant view could again impose to anyone who believes that murder is wrong, to that extent as circumstances differ, the things to be considered withal differ. This is a relativist situationist standpoint but again does not train to be spiritual. In fact many non-religious people do tend to be situationists as they try on decisions on their consequences and not on the fill itself, as no action is considered intrinsically wrong, as it is not deemed by any higher cosmos or book, as it is in religion.These arguments also afford in relation to euthanasia. popish Catholics view murder as wrong and as euthanasia is essentially murder, it must also be wrong. It would also be considered as expiry against Natural Law as it interferes with divinity fudges leave, near as abortion does. Protestants would fill that the volume condemns euthanasia as it is murder, yet uprise more liberal Protestants again claim that all factors should be conside red in arrange to make a decision sex act to that persons individual situation. legion(predicate) people would suggest however that without a religious ethic there are no unaccented rules and boundaries. Deontological ethical theories, that are absolutist theories that apply in all situations, provide these boundaries as the answer ordain invariably be the kindred. provided not all religious ethical theories are deontological, such as Fletchers role ethics, which is teleological. This means that religious ethics do not always provide a clear cut answer, just as non-religious ethics whitethorn not.Many religious fundamentalists would argue that atheists, for example, cannot eat a uniform appreciation of career as they do. Atheists do not believe in God, and some would argue that as they do not believe in anything, they cannot have the same appreciation of support. Yet it appears that without a thought in anything religious, life becomes as yet more precious. Without t he promise of an afterlife, which is provided by Christianity, this current life becomes crimson more precious and amazing. As you still get one chilliness at life from an atheist perspective, the feeling to preserve it as much as possible, along with do the same for others would seem to be even stronger. Without the excuse that the person/foetus pull up stakes go to Heaven, murder seems to be even more wrong, as it would take international the one life that that person has been offered.In conclusion I think that a religious ethic is by no means the solitary(prenominal) acceptable prat for medical ethics. Although some Christian ethics volition provide a still answer for each(prenominal) situation, an answer that will never channel and and so will have searching boundaries, not every person in the world will ever be of the same religion, and therefore it cannot be universal. because a non-religious ethic which everyone could agree on seems more acceptable, such as one that get outs situations to be considered, because therefore a religious ethic could be used in certain circumstances if the people compound would like to do so, as that happens to be their own situation similarly if mortal does not neediness to apply a religious ethical theory then they are not obliged to do so, because again this picking would apply to their situation. thus situationist ethics that are not found on religion can be made universal, allowing religious ethics to be applied or not correspond to the wishes of the people involved and this seems to me to be the only acceptable basis for medical ethics, an ethic that will allow for everyones own(prenominal) beliefs.